Friday, November 16, 2007


I still remember one lesson taught by my grammar teacher " whenever you are writing stuffs like mentioning 3 friends it should be ram shyam and me and not me, ram and shyam ."I feel that people have forgotten this very basic lesson for now wherever we find we see a predominant "me ".Even by nature i think its "me" for if i point a finger to someone the other four finger's still favor me.
Talk to a person and then hear his "me" 's." What are you doing this for".The answer is "me ".
We dislike politicians but still we all become so because even in our quest there is that "me " element .
Even in our context it's very true
1. Became a gen sec but there was an inherent desire that if i become one i will be short listed
in a particular company.
2 "Dude i am doing this because this will be a point in my resume"
3. "This proff gives only 2 s grades so ....."
The failure of the nuclear deal was also an outcome of "me"
In this fight of "me " we are getting away from "we ".let's build this gap of "me " and "we".
All thru' the day I me mine, I me mine, I me mine.
All thru' the night I me mine, I me mine, I me mine.


aniket said...

very true!

Anonymous said...

need to check that.. it's very me me for me

bhale said...

well.. its an intricate topic. 'Me' thing has both pros & cons. We can have a nice discussion on it.. on this 30th :)

Abhinav said...

ya presently it is important for u bhale to concentrate on we thing

karan said...

very very true... but how to change all these "ME's" to one "WE"

Chams said...

I liked the part with the fingers.Awsome imagination man!!!

galib said...

hey baccha nice to c someone cares 4 WE amidst so many MEzzzz!!!

good...keep comin...

hope to c more